The Regulatory Guardrail Build
A fixed-scope, 14-day architectural build to eliminate dangerous regulatory drift by anchoring your AI coding agents in a deterministic understanding of your SaMD and clinical regulatory domain.
The Regulatory Guardrail Build
14-Day Architectural BuildThe Problem
Large Language Models excel at generating code quickly, but they operate entirely on statistical probabilities. They do not know your unwritten clinical invariants, ePHI isolation boundaries, or strict regulatory constraints. When unleashed on a mission-critical healthtech codebase, development agents confidently guess. They invent parallel clinical workflows and unauthorized data paths, creating rogue compliance logic. This pushes a massive cognitive load downstream, taxing your most senior engineers with untangling hallucinated clinical logic and ePHI boundaries during code review.
The Solution
I extract the compliance logic currently relying on manual code reviews or probabilistic 'LLM-as-a-judge' validation and codify it into a formal regulatory domain model using localized Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) and the Z3 Theorem Prover. Plugged into your agentic development workflow, it instantly triggers verification checks with mathematical determinism, forcing development agents to self-correct against FDA, MDR, and HIPAA reality before a single line of code is written.
Why This Works
Methodology & Timeline
Delivery Mechanics for the 14-day build:
Targeted Domain Extraction (90-Minute Session)
Guardrail Engineering
Air-Gapped Delivery & Zero-Access Integration
Interactive Handover & Automated Verification
What You Walk Away With
Core Deliverables owned by your engineering team at the end of the 14-day build:
Financial Structure & Authorization
Structured as an Operational Velocity Investment of €19,500 (Excl. VAT), sized specifically to fall within standard VP of Engineering / CTO discretionary spending limits. The build commences upon mutual execution of the Statement of Work (SOW).
Satisfaction Guaranteed
Operational Assumptions: Maintaining the fixed-scope 14-day delivery timeline depends on timely feedback from designated technical stakeholders and a standard 48-hour SLA on intermediate schema reviews. In the event that internal operational priorities require a review pause, the 14-day delivery clock halts day-for-day, safeguarding architectural thoroughness without cutting corners.